MongoDB Index Optimization and Query Performance Analysis: Advanced Database Performance Tuning and Query Optimization for High-Performance Applications
High-performance database applications require sophisticated indexing strategies and comprehensive query optimization techniques that can handle complex query patterns, large data volumes, and evolving access requirements while maintaining optimal response times. Traditional database optimization approaches often struggle with dynamic workloads, compound query patterns, and the complexity of managing multiple index strategies across diverse data access patterns, leading to suboptimal performance, excessive resource consumption, and operational challenges in production environments.
MongoDB provides comprehensive index optimization capabilities through advanced indexing strategies, sophisticated query analysis tools, and intelligent performance monitoring features that enable database administrators and developers to achieve optimal query performance with minimal resource overhead. Unlike traditional databases that require complex index tuning procedures and manual optimization workflows, MongoDB integrates performance analysis directly into the database with automated index recommendations, real-time query analysis, and built-in optimization guidance.
The Traditional Query Performance Challenge
Conventional approaches to database query optimization in relational systems face significant limitations in performance analysis and index management:
-- Traditional PostgreSQL query optimization - manual index management with limited analysis capabilities
-- Basic index tracking table with minimal functionality
CREATE TABLE index_usage_stats (
index_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
schema_name VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
table_name VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
index_name VARCHAR(100) NOT NULL,
index_type VARCHAR(50),
-- Basic usage statistics (very limited visibility)
index_scans BIGINT DEFAULT 0,
tuples_read BIGINT DEFAULT 0,
tuples_fetched BIGINT DEFAULT 0,
-- Size information (manual tracking)
index_size_bytes BIGINT,
table_size_bytes BIGINT,
-- Basic metadata
created_at TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
last_analyzed TIMESTAMP,
is_unique BOOLEAN DEFAULT false,
is_partial BOOLEAN DEFAULT false,
-- Simple effectiveness metrics
scan_ratio DECIMAL(10,4),
selectivity_estimate DECIMAL(10,4)
);
-- Query performance tracking table (basic functionality)
CREATE TABLE query_performance_log (
query_id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
query_hash VARCHAR(64),
query_text TEXT,
-- Basic execution metrics
execution_time_ms INTEGER,
rows_examined BIGINT,
rows_returned BIGINT,
execution_timestamp TIMESTAMP DEFAULT CURRENT_TIMESTAMP,
-- Resource usage (limited tracking)
cpu_usage_ms INTEGER,
memory_usage_kb INTEGER,
disk_reads INTEGER,
-- Connection information
database_name VARCHAR(100),
username VARCHAR(100),
application_name VARCHAR(100),
-- Basic query plan information (very limited)
query_plan_hash VARCHAR(64),
index_usage TEXT[], -- Simple array of index names
-- Performance classification
performance_category VARCHAR(50) DEFAULT 'unknown'
);
-- Manual query plan analysis function (very basic capabilities)
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION analyze_query_performance(
query_text_param TEXT,
execution_count INTEGER DEFAULT 1
) RETURNS TABLE (
avg_execution_time_ms INTEGER,
total_rows_examined BIGINT,
total_rows_returned BIGINT,
selectivity_ratio DECIMAL(10,4),
suggested_indexes TEXT[],
performance_rating VARCHAR(20)
) AS $$
DECLARE
total_execution_time INTEGER := 0;
total_examined BIGINT := 0;
total_returned BIGINT := 0;
execution_counter INTEGER := 0;
current_execution_time INTEGER;
current_examined BIGINT;
current_returned BIGINT;
plan_info TEXT;
BEGIN
-- Simulate multiple query executions for analysis
WHILE execution_counter < execution_count LOOP
-- Execute EXPLAIN ANALYZE (simplified simulation)
BEGIN
-- This would be an actual EXPLAIN ANALYZE in reality
EXECUTE 'EXPLAIN ANALYZE ' || query_text_param INTO plan_info;
-- Extract basic metrics (very simplified parsing)
current_execution_time := (random() * 1000 + 10)::INTEGER; -- Simulated execution time
current_examined := (random() * 10000 + 100)::BIGINT; -- Simulated rows examined
current_returned := (random() * 1000 + 10)::BIGINT; -- Simulated rows returned
total_execution_time := total_execution_time + current_execution_time;
total_examined := total_examined + current_examined;
total_returned := total_returned + current_returned;
-- Log query performance
INSERT INTO query_performance_log (
query_text,
execution_time_ms,
rows_examined,
rows_returned,
query_plan_hash
) VALUES (
query_text_param,
current_execution_time,
current_examined,
current_returned,
md5(plan_info)
);
EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
-- Basic error handling
current_execution_time := 9999; -- Error indicator
current_examined := 0;
current_returned := 0;
END;
execution_counter := execution_counter + 1;
END LOOP;
-- Calculate average metrics
RETURN QUERY SELECT
(total_execution_time / execution_count)::INTEGER,
total_examined,
total_returned,
CASE
WHEN total_examined > 0 THEN (total_returned::DECIMAL / total_examined)
ELSE 0
END,
-- Very basic index suggestions (limited analysis)
CASE
WHEN total_execution_time > 1000 THEN ARRAY['Consider adding indexes on WHERE clause columns']
WHEN total_examined > total_returned * 10 THEN ARRAY['Add indexes to improve selectivity']
ELSE ARRAY['Performance appears acceptable']
END::TEXT[],
-- Simple performance rating
CASE
WHEN total_execution_time < 100 THEN 'excellent'
WHEN total_execution_time < 500 THEN 'good'
WHEN total_execution_time < 1000 THEN 'acceptable'
ELSE 'poor'
END;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
-- Execute query performance analysis (basic functionality)
SELECT * FROM analyze_query_performance('SELECT * FROM users WHERE email = ''[email protected]'' AND created_at > ''2023-01-01''', 5);
-- Index effectiveness monitoring (limited capabilities)
WITH index_effectiveness AS (
SELECT
ius.schema_name,
ius.table_name,
ius.index_name,
ius.index_type,
ius.index_scans,
ius.tuples_read,
ius.tuples_fetched,
ius.index_size_bytes,
-- Basic effectiveness calculations
CASE
WHEN ius.index_scans > 0 AND ius.tuples_read > 0 THEN
ius.tuples_fetched::DECIMAL / ius.tuples_read
ELSE 0
END as fetch_ratio,
CASE
WHEN ius.table_size_bytes > 0 AND ius.index_size_bytes > 0 THEN
(ius.index_size_bytes::DECIMAL / ius.table_size_bytes) * 100
ELSE 0
END as size_overhead_percent,
-- Usage frequency analysis
CASE
WHEN ius.index_scans = 0 THEN 'unused'
WHEN ius.index_scans < 10 THEN 'rarely_used'
WHEN ius.index_scans < 100 THEN 'moderately_used'
ELSE 'frequently_used'
END as usage_category
FROM index_usage_stats ius
WHERE ius.last_analyzed >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '7 days'
),
query_patterns AS (
SELECT
qpl.database_name,
qpl.query_hash,
COUNT(*) as execution_count,
AVG(qpl.execution_time_ms) as avg_execution_time,
MAX(qpl.execution_time_ms) as max_execution_time,
AVG(qpl.rows_examined) as avg_rows_examined,
AVG(qpl.rows_returned) as avg_rows_returned,
-- Performance trend analysis (very basic)
CASE
WHEN COUNT(*) > 100 AND AVG(qpl.execution_time_ms) > 500 THEN 'high_impact_slow'
WHEN COUNT(*) > 1000 THEN 'high_frequency'
WHEN AVG(qpl.execution_time_ms) > 1000 THEN 'slow_query'
ELSE 'normal'
END as query_pattern_type,
-- Index usage analysis from query logs
STRING_AGG(DISTINCT unnest(qpl.index_usage), ', ') as indexes_used,
-- Execution time trends
PERCENTILE_CONT(0.95) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY qpl.execution_time_ms) as p95_execution_time
FROM query_performance_log qpl
WHERE qpl.execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '7 days'
GROUP BY qpl.database_name, qpl.query_hash
)
SELECT
ie.schema_name,
ie.table_name,
ie.index_name,
ie.index_type,
ie.usage_category,
-- Index effectiveness metrics
ie.index_scans,
ROUND(ie.fetch_ratio, 4) as selectivity_ratio,
ROUND(ie.size_overhead_percent, 2) as size_overhead_percent,
-- Size analysis
ROUND(ie.index_size_bytes / 1024.0 / 1024.0, 2) as index_size_mb,
-- Related query patterns
COUNT(qp.query_hash) as related_query_patterns,
COALESCE(AVG(qp.avg_execution_time), 0) as avg_query_time_using_index,
COALESCE(AVG(qp.avg_rows_examined), 0) as avg_rows_examined,
-- Index recommendations (very basic logic)
CASE
WHEN ie.usage_category = 'unused' AND ie.index_size_bytes > 100*1024*1024 THEN 'consider_dropping'
WHEN ie.fetch_ratio < 0.1 AND ie.index_scans > 0 THEN 'poor_selectivity'
WHEN ie.usage_category = 'frequently_used' AND ie.fetch_ratio > 0.8 THEN 'high_performance'
WHEN ie.size_overhead_percent > 50 THEN 'review_necessity'
ELSE 'monitor'
END as recommendation,
-- Performance impact assessment
CASE
WHEN ie.usage_category IN ('frequently_used', 'moderately_used') AND ie.fetch_ratio > 0.5 THEN 'positive_impact'
WHEN ie.usage_category = 'unused' THEN 'no_impact'
WHEN ie.fetch_ratio < 0.1 THEN 'negative_impact'
ELSE 'unclear_impact'
END as performance_impact
FROM index_effectiveness ie
LEFT JOIN query_patterns qp ON qp.indexes_used LIKE '%' || ie.index_name || '%'
GROUP BY
ie.schema_name, ie.table_name, ie.index_name, ie.index_type,
ie.usage_category, ie.index_scans, ie.fetch_ratio,
ie.size_overhead_percent, ie.index_size_bytes
ORDER BY
ie.index_scans DESC,
ie.fetch_ratio DESC,
ie.index_size_bytes DESC;
-- Query optimization recommendations (very limited analysis)
WITH slow_queries AS (
SELECT
query_hash,
query_text,
COUNT(*) as execution_count,
AVG(execution_time_ms) as avg_time,
MAX(execution_time_ms) as max_time,
AVG(rows_examined) as avg_examined,
AVG(rows_returned) as avg_returned,
-- Basic pattern detection
CASE
WHEN query_text ILIKE '%WHERE%=%' THEN 'equality_filter'
WHEN query_text ILIKE '%WHERE%>%' OR query_text ILIKE '%WHERE%<%' THEN 'range_filter'
WHEN query_text ILIKE '%ORDER BY%' THEN 'sorting'
WHEN query_text ILIKE '%GROUP BY%' THEN 'aggregation'
ELSE 'unknown_pattern'
END as query_pattern
FROM query_performance_log
WHERE execution_time_ms > 500 -- Focus on slow queries
AND execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_DATE - INTERVAL '24 hours'
GROUP BY query_hash, query_text
HAVING COUNT(*) >= 5 -- Frequently executed slow queries
)
SELECT
sq.query_hash,
LEFT(sq.query_text, 100) || '...' as query_preview,
sq.execution_count,
ROUND(sq.avg_time, 0) as avg_execution_ms,
sq.max_time as max_execution_ms,
ROUND(sq.avg_examined, 0) as avg_rows_examined,
ROUND(sq.avg_returned, 0) as avg_rows_returned,
sq.query_pattern,
-- Selectivity analysis
CASE
WHEN sq.avg_examined > 0 THEN
ROUND((sq.avg_returned / sq.avg_examined) * 100, 2)
ELSE 0
END as selectivity_percent,
-- Impact assessment
ROUND(sq.execution_count * sq.avg_time, 0) as total_time_impact_ms,
-- Basic optimization suggestions (very limited)
CASE
WHEN sq.query_pattern = 'equality_filter' AND sq.avg_examined > sq.avg_returned * 10 THEN
'Add single-column index on equality filter columns'
WHEN sq.query_pattern = 'range_filter' AND sq.avg_time > 1000 THEN
'Consider range-optimized index or query rewrite'
WHEN sq.query_pattern = 'sorting' AND sq.avg_time > 800 THEN
'Add index supporting ORDER BY clause'
WHEN sq.query_pattern = 'aggregation' AND sq.avg_examined > 10000 THEN
'Consider partial index or pre-aggregated data'
WHEN sq.avg_examined > sq.avg_returned * 100 THEN
'Review query selectivity and indexing strategy'
ELSE 'Manual analysis required'
END as optimization_suggestion,
-- Priority assessment
CASE
WHEN sq.execution_count > 100 AND sq.avg_time > 1000 THEN 'high'
WHEN sq.execution_count > 50 OR sq.avg_time > 2000 THEN 'medium'
ELSE 'low'
END as optimization_priority
FROM slow_queries sq
ORDER BY
CASE
WHEN sq.execution_count > 100 AND sq.avg_time > 1000 THEN 1
WHEN sq.execution_count > 50 OR sq.avg_time > 2000 THEN 2
ELSE 3
END,
(sq.execution_count * sq.avg_time) DESC;
-- Problems with traditional query optimization approaches:
-- 1. Manual index management with no automated recommendations
-- 2. Limited query plan analysis and optimization guidance
-- 3. Basic performance metrics with no comprehensive analysis
-- 4. No real-time query performance monitoring
-- 5. Minimal index effectiveness assessment
-- 6. Complex manual tuning procedures requiring deep database expertise
-- 7. No support for compound index optimization strategies
-- 8. Limited visibility into query execution patterns and resource usage
-- 9. Basic alerting with no proactive optimization suggestions
-- 10. No integration with application performance monitoring systems
MongoDB provides comprehensive index optimization with advanced query performance analysis capabilities:
// MongoDB Advanced Index Optimization and Query Performance Analysis
const { MongoClient } = require('mongodb');
const { EventEmitter } = require('events');
// Comprehensive MongoDB Performance Optimizer
class AdvancedPerformanceOptimizer extends EventEmitter {
constructor(mongoUri, optimizationConfig = {}) {
super();
this.mongoUri = mongoUri;
this.client = null;
this.db = null;
// Advanced optimization configuration
this.config = {
// Performance analysis configuration
enableQueryProfiling: optimizationConfig.enableQueryProfiling !== false,
profilingSampleRate: optimizationConfig.profilingSampleRate || 0.1,
slowQueryThresholdMs: optimizationConfig.slowQueryThresholdMs || 100,
// Index optimization settings
enableAutomaticIndexRecommendations: optimizationConfig.enableAutomaticIndexRecommendations !== false,
enableIndexUsageAnalysis: optimizationConfig.enableIndexUsageAnalysis !== false,
enableCompoundIndexOptimization: optimizationConfig.enableCompoundIndexOptimization || false,
// Monitoring and alerting
enablePerformanceMonitoring: optimizationConfig.enablePerformanceMonitoring !== false,
enableRealTimeAnalysis: optimizationConfig.enableRealTimeAnalysis || false,
enablePerformanceAlerting: optimizationConfig.enablePerformanceAlerting || false,
// Analysis parameters
analysisWindowHours: optimizationConfig.analysisWindowHours || 24,
minQueryExecutions: optimizationConfig.minQueryExecutions || 10,
indexUsageThreshold: optimizationConfig.indexUsageThreshold || 0.1,
// Resource optimization
enableResourceOptimization: optimizationConfig.enableResourceOptimization || false,
enableQueryPlanCaching: optimizationConfig.enableQueryPlanCaching !== false,
enableConnectionPoolOptimization: optimizationConfig.enableConnectionPoolOptimization || false
};
// Performance tracking and analysis state
this.queryPatterns = new Map();
this.indexUsageStats = new Map();
this.performanceMetrics = new Map();
this.optimizationRecommendations = [];
// Query execution tracking
this.queryExecutionHistory = [];
this.slowQueryLog = [];
this.indexEffectivenessCache = new Map();
this.initializePerformanceOptimizer();
}
async initializePerformanceOptimizer() {
console.log('Initializing advanced MongoDB performance optimizer...');
try {
// Connect to MongoDB
this.client = new MongoClient(this.mongoUri, {
// Optimized connection settings
maxPoolSize: 20,
minPoolSize: 5,
maxIdleTimeMS: 30000,
serverSelectionTimeoutMS: 5000,
heartbeatFrequencyMS: 10000
});
await this.client.connect();
this.db = this.client.db();
// Setup performance monitoring infrastructure
await this.setupPerformanceInfrastructure();
// Enable query profiling if configured
if (this.config.enableQueryProfiling) {
await this.enableQueryProfiling();
}
// Start real-time monitoring if enabled
if (this.config.enableRealTimeAnalysis) {
await this.startRealTimeMonitoring();
}
// Initialize index analysis
if (this.config.enableIndexUsageAnalysis) {
await this.initializeIndexAnalysis();
}
console.log('Advanced performance optimizer initialized successfully');
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error initializing performance optimizer:', error);
throw error;
}
}
async setupPerformanceInfrastructure() {
console.log('Setting up performance monitoring infrastructure...');
try {
// Create collections for performance tracking
const collections = {
queryPerformanceLog: this.db.collection('query_performance_log'),
indexUsageStats: this.db.collection('index_usage_stats'),
performanceMetrics: this.db.collection('performance_metrics'),
optimizationRecommendations: this.db.collection('optimization_recommendations'),
queryPatterns: this.db.collection('query_patterns')
};
// Create indexes for performance collections
await collections.queryPerformanceLog.createIndex(
{ timestamp: -1, executionTimeMs: -1 },
{ background: true, expireAfterSeconds: 7 * 24 * 60 * 60 } // 7 days retention
);
await collections.indexUsageStats.createIndex(
{ collection: 1, indexName: 1, timestamp: -1 },
{ background: true }
);
await collections.performanceMetrics.createIndex(
{ metricType: 1, timestamp: -1 },
{ background: true, expireAfterSeconds: 30 * 24 * 60 * 60 } // 30 days retention
);
this.collections = collections;
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error setting up performance infrastructure:', error);
throw error;
}
}
async enableQueryProfiling() {
console.log('Enabling MongoDB query profiling...');
try {
// Set profiling level based on configuration
await this.db.admin().command({
profile: 2, // Profile all operations
slowms: this.config.slowQueryThresholdMs,
sampleRate: this.config.profilingSampleRate
});
console.log(`Query profiling enabled with ${this.config.slowQueryThresholdMs}ms threshold and ${this.config.profilingSampleRate} sample rate`);
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error enabling query profiling:', error);
// Don't throw - profiling is optional
}
}
async analyzeQueryPerformance(timeRangeHours = 24) {
console.log(`Analyzing query performance for the last ${timeRangeHours} hours...`);
try {
const analysisStartTime = new Date(Date.now() - (timeRangeHours * 60 * 60 * 1000));
// Analyze profiler data for slow queries and patterns
const slowQueries = await this.analyzeSlowQueries(analysisStartTime);
const queryPatterns = await this.analyzeQueryPatterns(analysisStartTime);
const indexUsageAnalysis = await this.analyzeIndexUsage(analysisStartTime);
// Generate performance insights
const performanceInsights = {
analysisTimestamp: new Date(),
timeRangeHours: timeRangeHours,
// Query performance summary
queryPerformanceSummary: {
totalQueries: slowQueries.totalQueries,
slowQueries: slowQueries.slowQueryCount,
averageExecutionTime: slowQueries.averageExecutionTime,
p95ExecutionTime: slowQueries.p95ExecutionTime,
p99ExecutionTime: slowQueries.p99ExecutionTime,
// Query type distribution
queryTypeDistribution: queryPatterns.queryTypeDistribution,
// Resource usage patterns
resourceUsage: {
totalExaminedDocuments: slowQueries.totalExaminedDocuments,
totalReturnedDocuments: slowQueries.totalReturnedDocuments,
averageSelectivityRatio: slowQueries.averageSelectivityRatio
}
},
// Index effectiveness analysis
indexEffectiveness: {
totalIndexes: indexUsageAnalysis.totalIndexes,
activelyUsedIndexes: indexUsageAnalysis.activelyUsedIndexes,
unusedIndexes: indexUsageAnalysis.unusedIndexes,
inefficientIndexes: indexUsageAnalysis.inefficientIndexes,
// Index usage patterns
indexUsagePatterns: indexUsageAnalysis.usagePatterns,
// Index performance metrics
averageIndexSelectivity: indexUsageAnalysis.averageSelectivity,
indexSizeOverhead: indexUsageAnalysis.totalIndexSizeBytes
},
// Performance bottlenecks
performanceBottlenecks: await this.identifyPerformanceBottlenecks(slowQueries, queryPatterns, indexUsageAnalysis),
// Optimization opportunities
optimizationOpportunities: await this.generateOptimizationRecommendations(slowQueries, queryPatterns, indexUsageAnalysis)
};
// Store performance analysis results
await this.collections.performanceMetrics.insertOne({
metricType: 'comprehensive_analysis',
timestamp: new Date(),
analysisResults: performanceInsights
});
this.emit('performanceAnalysisCompleted', performanceInsights);
return {
success: true,
analysisResults: performanceInsights
};
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error analyzing query performance:', error);
return {
success: false,
error: error.message
};
}
}
async analyzeSlowQueries(startTime) {
console.log('Analyzing slow query patterns...');
try {
// Query the profiler collection for slow queries
const profilerCollection = this.db.collection('system.profile');
const slowQueryAggregation = [
{
$match: {
ts: { $gte: startTime },
op: { $in: ['query', 'getmore'] }, // Focus on read operations
millis: { $gte: this.config.slowQueryThresholdMs }
}
},
{
$addFields: {
// Normalize query shape for pattern analysis
queryShape: {
$function: {
body: function(command) {
// Simplified query shape normalization
if (!command || !command.find) return 'unknown';
const filter = command.find.filter || {};
const sort = command.find.sort || {};
const projection = command.find.projection || {};
// Create shape by replacing values with type indicators
const shapeFilter = Object.keys(filter).reduce((acc, key) => {
acc[key] = typeof filter[key];
return acc;
}, {});
return JSON.stringify({
filter: shapeFilter,
sort: Object.keys(sort),
projection: Object.keys(projection)
});
},
args: ['$command'],
lang: 'js'
}
},
// Extract collection name
targetCollection: {
$ifNull: ['$command.find', '$command.collection']
},
// Calculate selectivity ratio
selectivityRatio: {
$cond: [
{ $and: [{ $gt: ['$docsExamined', 0] }, { $gt: ['$nreturned', 0] }] },
{ $divide: ['$nreturned', '$docsExamined'] },
0
]
}
}
},
{
$group: {
_id: {
queryShape: '$queryShape',
collection: '$targetCollection'
},
// Execution statistics
executionCount: { $sum: 1 },
totalExecutionTime: { $sum: '$millis' },
averageExecutionTime: { $avg: '$millis' },
maxExecutionTime: { $max: '$millis' },
minExecutionTime: { $min: '$millis' },
// Document examination statistics
totalDocsExamined: { $sum: '$docsExamined' },
totalDocsReturned: { $sum: '$nreturned' },
averageSelectivity: { $avg: '$selectivityRatio' },
// Index usage tracking
indexesUsed: { $addToSet: '$planSummary' },
// Resource usage
totalKeysExamined: { $sum: '$keysExamined' },
// Sample query for reference
sampleQuery: { $first: '$command' },
sampleTimestamp: { $first: '$ts' }
}
},
{
$addFields: {
// Calculate performance impact
performanceImpact: {
$multiply: ['$executionCount', '$averageExecutionTime']
},
// Assess query efficiency
queryEfficiency: {
$cond: [
{ $gt: ['$averageSelectivity', 0.1] },
'efficient',
{ $cond: [{ $gt: ['$averageSelectivity', 0.01] }, 'moderate', 'inefficient'] }
]
}
}
},
{
$sort: { performanceImpact: -1 }
},
{
$limit: 100 // Top 100 slow query patterns
}
];
const slowQueryResults = await profilerCollection.aggregate(slowQueryAggregation).toArray();
// Calculate summary statistics
const totalQueries = slowQueryResults.reduce((sum, query) => sum + query.executionCount, 0);
const totalExecutionTime = slowQueryResults.reduce((sum, query) => sum + query.totalExecutionTime, 0);
const allExecutionTimes = slowQueryResults.flatMap(query => Array(query.executionCount).fill(query.averageExecutionTime));
// Calculate percentiles
allExecutionTimes.sort((a, b) => a - b);
const p95Index = Math.floor(allExecutionTimes.length * 0.95);
const p99Index = Math.floor(allExecutionTimes.length * 0.99);
return {
slowQueryPatterns: slowQueryResults,
totalQueries: totalQueries,
slowQueryCount: slowQueryResults.length,
averageExecutionTime: totalQueries > 0 ? totalExecutionTime / totalQueries : 0,
p95ExecutionTime: allExecutionTimes[p95Index] || 0,
p99ExecutionTime: allExecutionTimes[p99Index] || 0,
totalExaminedDocuments: slowQueryResults.reduce((sum, query) => sum + query.totalDocsExamined, 0),
totalReturnedDocuments: slowQueryResults.reduce((sum, query) => sum + query.totalDocsReturned, 0),
averageSelectivityRatio: slowQueryResults.length > 0
? slowQueryResults.reduce((sum, query) => sum + (query.averageSelectivity || 0), 0) / slowQueryResults.length
: 0
};
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error analyzing slow queries:', error);
throw error;
}
}
async analyzeQueryPatterns(startTime) {
console.log('Analyzing query execution patterns...');
try {
const profilerCollection = this.db.collection('system.profile');
// Analyze query type distribution and patterns
const queryPatternAggregation = [
{
$match: {
ts: { $gte: startTime },
op: { $in: ['query', 'getmore', 'update', 'delete', 'insert'] }
}
},
{
$addFields: {
// Categorize query operations
queryCategory: {
$switch: {
branches: [
{
case: { $eq: ['$op', 'query'] },
then: {
$cond: [
{ $ifNull: ['$command.find.sort', false] },
'sorted_query',
{ $cond: [
{ $gt: [{ $size: { $objectToArray: { $ifNull: ['$command.find.filter', {}] } } }, 0] },
'filtered_query',
'full_scan'
]}
]
}
},
{ case: { $eq: ['$op', 'update'] }, then: 'update_operation' },
{ case: { $eq: ['$op', 'delete'] }, then: 'delete_operation' },
{ case: { $eq: ['$op', 'insert'] }, then: 'insert_operation' }
],
default: 'other_operation'
}
},
// Analyze query complexity
queryComplexity: {
$switch: {
branches: [
{
case: { $and: [
{ $eq: ['$op', 'query'] },
{ $gt: [{ $size: { $objectToArray: { $ifNull: ['$command.find.filter', {}] } } }, 5] }
]},
then: 'complex'
},
{
case: { $and: [
{ $eq: ['$op', 'query'] },
{ $gt: [{ $size: { $objectToArray: { $ifNull: ['$command.find.filter', {}] } } }, 2] }
]},
then: 'moderate'
}
],
default: 'simple'
}
}
}
},
{
$group: {
_id: {
collection: { $ifNull: ['$command.find', '$command.collection', '$ns'] },
queryCategory: '$queryCategory',
queryComplexity: '$queryComplexity'
},
// Pattern statistics
executionCount: { $sum: 1 },
averageExecutionTime: { $avg: '$millis' },
totalExecutionTime: { $sum: '$millis' },
// Resource usage patterns
averageDocsExamined: { $avg: '$docsExamined' },
averageDocsReturned: { $avg: '$nreturned' },
// Index usage patterns
commonIndexes: { $addToSet: '$planSummary' },
// Performance characteristics
maxExecutionTime: { $max: '$millis' },
minExecutionTime: { $min: '$millis' }
}
},
{
$sort: { totalExecutionTime: -1 }
}
];
const queryPatternResults = await profilerCollection.aggregate(queryPatternAggregation).toArray();
// Calculate query type distribution
const queryTypeDistribution = queryPatternResults.reduce((distribution, pattern) => {
const category = pattern._id.queryCategory;
if (!distribution[category]) {
distribution[category] = {
count: 0,
totalTime: 0,
avgTime: 0
};
}
distribution[category].count += pattern.executionCount;
distribution[category].totalTime += pattern.totalExecutionTime;
distribution[category].avgTime = distribution[category].totalTime / distribution[category].count;
return distribution;
}, {});
return {
queryPatterns: queryPatternResults,
queryTypeDistribution: queryTypeDistribution,
totalPatterns: queryPatternResults.length
};
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error analyzing query patterns:', error);
throw error;
}
}
async analyzeIndexUsage(startTime) {
console.log('Analyzing index usage effectiveness...');
try {
// Get all collections for comprehensive index analysis
const collections = await this.db.listCollections().toArray();
const indexAnalysisResults = [];
for (const collectionInfo of collections) {
if (collectionInfo.type === 'collection') {
const collection = this.db.collection(collectionInfo.name);
// Get index information
const indexes = await collection.indexes();
// Analyze each index
for (const index of indexes) {
try {
// Get index usage statistics
const indexStats = await collection.aggregate([
{ $indexStats: {} },
{ $match: { name: index.name } }
]).toArray();
const indexStat = indexStats[0];
if (indexStat) {
// Calculate index effectiveness metrics
const indexAnalysis = {
collection: collectionInfo.name,
indexName: index.name,
indexKeys: index.key,
indexType: this.determineIndexType(index),
// Usage statistics
usageCount: indexStat.accesses?.ops || 0,
lastUsed: indexStat.accesses?.since || null,
// Size and storage information
indexSize: index.size || 0,
// Effectiveness calculations
usageEffectiveness: this.calculateIndexEffectiveness(indexStat, index),
// Index health assessment
healthStatus: this.assessIndexHealth(indexStat, index),
// Optimization opportunities
optimizationOpportunities: await this.identifyIndexOptimizations(collection, index, indexStat)
};
indexAnalysisResults.push(indexAnalysis);
}
} catch (indexError) {
console.warn(`Error analyzing index ${index.name} on ${collectionInfo.name}:`, indexError.message);
}
}
}
}
// Calculate summary statistics
const totalIndexes = indexAnalysisResults.length;
const activelyUsedIndexes = indexAnalysisResults.filter(index => index.usageCount > 0).length;
const unusedIndexes = indexAnalysisResults.filter(index => index.usageCount === 0);
const inefficientIndexes = indexAnalysisResults.filter(index =>
index.healthStatus === 'inefficient' || index.usageEffectiveness < 0.1
);
// Analyze usage patterns
const usagePatterns = this.analyzeIndexUsagePatterns(indexAnalysisResults);
return {
indexAnalysisResults: indexAnalysisResults,
totalIndexes: totalIndexes,
activelyUsedIndexes: activelyUsedIndexes,
unusedIndexes: unusedIndexes,
inefficientIndexes: inefficientIndexes,
usagePatterns: usagePatterns,
averageSelectivity: this.calculateAverageIndexSelectivity(indexAnalysisResults),
totalIndexSizeBytes: indexAnalysisResults.reduce((total, index) => total + (index.indexSize || 0), 0)
};
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error analyzing index usage:', error);
throw error;
}
}
async generateOptimizationRecommendations(slowQueries, queryPatterns, indexUsage) {
console.log('Generating performance optimization recommendations...');
try {
const recommendations = [];
// Analyze slow queries for index recommendations
for (const slowQuery of slowQueries.slowQueryPatterns) {
if (slowQuery.averageSelectivity < 0.1 && slowQuery.executionCount > this.config.minQueryExecutions) {
recommendations.push({
type: 'index_recommendation',
priority: 'high',
collection: slowQuery._id.collection,
issue: 'Low selectivity query pattern with high execution frequency',
recommendation: await this.generateIndexRecommendation(slowQuery),
expectedImprovement: this.estimatePerformanceImprovement(slowQuery),
implementationComplexity: 'medium',
estimatedImpact: slowQuery.performanceImpact
});
}
}
// Analyze unused indexes
for (const unusedIndex of indexUsage.unusedIndexes) {
if (unusedIndex.indexName !== '_id_') { // Never recommend dropping _id index
recommendations.push({
type: 'index_cleanup',
priority: 'medium',
collection: unusedIndex.collection,
issue: `Unused index consuming storage space: ${unusedIndex.indexName}`,
recommendation: `Consider dropping unused index '${unusedIndex.indexName}' to save ${Math.round((unusedIndex.indexSize || 0) / 1024 / 1024)} MB storage`,
expectedImprovement: {
storageReduction: unusedIndex.indexSize || 0,
maintenanceOverheadReduction: 'low'
},
implementationComplexity: 'low',
estimatedImpact: unusedIndex.indexSize || 0
});
}
}
// Analyze compound index opportunities
if (this.config.enableCompoundIndexOptimization) {
const compoundIndexOpportunities = await this.analyzeCompoundIndexOpportunities(queryPatterns);
recommendations.push(...compoundIndexOpportunities);
}
// Sort recommendations by priority and estimated impact
recommendations.sort((a, b) => {
const priorityOrder = { high: 3, medium: 2, low: 1 };
const priorityDiff = priorityOrder[b.priority] - priorityOrder[a.priority];
if (priorityDiff !== 0) return priorityDiff;
return (b.estimatedImpact || 0) - (a.estimatedImpact || 0);
});
return recommendations.slice(0, 20); // Return top 20 recommendations
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error generating optimization recommendations:', error);
return [];
}
}
async generateIndexRecommendation(slowQuery) {
try {
// Analyze the query shape to determine optimal index structure
const queryShape = JSON.parse(slowQuery._id.queryShape);
const filterFields = Object.keys(queryShape.filter || {});
const sortFields = queryShape.sort || [];
let recommendedIndex = {};
// Build compound index recommendation based on query patterns
// Rule 1: Equality filters first
filterFields.forEach(field => {
if (queryShape.filter[field] === 'string' || queryShape.filter[field] === 'number') {
recommendedIndex[field] = 1;
}
});
// Rule 2: Range filters after equality filters
filterFields.forEach(field => {
if (queryShape.filter[field] === 'object') { // Likely range query
if (!recommendedIndex[field]) {
recommendedIndex[field] = 1;
}
}
});
// Rule 3: Sort fields last
sortFields.forEach(field => {
if (!recommendedIndex[field]) {
recommendedIndex[field] = 1;
}
});
return {
suggestedIndex: recommendedIndex,
indexCommand: `db.${slowQuery._id.collection}.createIndex(${JSON.stringify(recommendedIndex)})`,
reasoning: `Compound index optimized for query pattern with ${filterFields.length} filter fields and ${sortFields.length} sort fields`,
estimatedSize: this.estimateIndexSize(recommendedIndex, slowQuery._id.collection)
};
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error generating index recommendation:', error);
return {
suggestedIndex: {},
indexCommand: 'Manual analysis required',
reasoning: 'Unable to analyze query pattern automatically',
estimatedSize: 0
};
}
}
async explainQuery(collection, query, options = {}) {
console.log(`Explaining query execution plan for collection: ${collection}`);
try {
const targetCollection = this.db.collection(collection);
// Execute explain with detailed execution stats
const explainResult = await targetCollection
.find(query.filter || {}, options)
.sort(query.sort || {})
.limit(query.limit || 0)
.explain('executionStats');
// Analyze execution plan
const executionAnalysis = this.analyzeExecutionPlan(explainResult);
// Generate optimization insights
const optimizationInsights = await this.generateQueryOptimizationInsights(
collection,
query,
explainResult,
executionAnalysis
);
return {
success: true,
query: query,
executionPlan: explainResult,
executionAnalysis: executionAnalysis,
optimizationInsights: optimizationInsights,
explainTimestamp: new Date()
};
} catch (error) {
console.error(`Error explaining query for collection ${collection}:`, error);
return {
success: false,
collection: collection,
query: query,
error: error.message
};
}
}
analyzeExecutionPlan(explainResult) {
try {
const executionStats = explainResult.executionStats;
const winningPlan = explainResult.queryPlanner?.winningPlan;
const analysis = {
// Basic execution metrics
executionTime: executionStats.executionTimeMillis,
documentsExamined: executionStats.totalDocsExamined,
documentsReturned: executionStats.totalDocsReturned,
keysExamined: executionStats.totalKeysExamined,
// Efficiency calculations
selectivityRatio: executionStats.totalDocsExamined > 0
? executionStats.totalDocsReturned / executionStats.totalDocsExamined
: 0,
indexEfficiency: executionStats.totalKeysExamined > 0
? executionStats.totalDocsReturned / executionStats.totalKeysExamined
: 0,
// Plan analysis
planType: this.identifyPlanType(winningPlan),
indexesUsed: this.extractIndexesUsed(winningPlan),
hasSort: this.hasSortStage(winningPlan),
hasBlockingSort: this.hasBlockingSortStage(winningPlan),
// Performance assessment
performanceRating: this.assessQueryPerformance(executionStats, winningPlan),
// Resource usage
workingSetSize: executionStats.workingSetSize || 0,
// Optimization opportunities
needsOptimization: this.needsOptimization(executionStats, winningPlan)
};
return analysis;
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error analyzing execution plan:', error);
return {
error: 'Failed to analyze execution plan',
executionTime: 0,
documentsExamined: 0,
documentsReturned: 0,
needsOptimization: true
};
}
}
async generateQueryOptimizationInsights(collection, query, explainResult, executionAnalysis) {
try {
const insights = [];
// Check for full collection scans
if (executionAnalysis.planType === 'COLLSCAN') {
insights.push({
type: 'full_scan_detected',
severity: 'high',
message: 'Query is performing a full collection scan',
recommendation: 'Add an appropriate index to avoid collection scanning',
suggestedIndex: await this.suggestIndexForQuery(query)
});
}
// Check for low selectivity
if (executionAnalysis.selectivityRatio < 0.1) {
insights.push({
type: 'low_selectivity',
severity: 'medium',
message: `Query selectivity is low (${(executionAnalysis.selectivityRatio * 100).toFixed(2)}%)`,
recommendation: 'Consider more selective query conditions or compound indexes',
currentSelectivity: executionAnalysis.selectivityRatio
});
}
// Check for blocking sorts
if (executionAnalysis.hasBlockingSort) {
insights.push({
type: 'blocking_sort',
severity: 'high',
message: 'Query requires in-memory sorting which can be expensive',
recommendation: 'Create an index that supports the sort order',
suggestedIndex: this.suggestSortIndex(query.sort)
});
}
// Check for excessive key examination
if (executionAnalysis.keysExamined > executionAnalysis.documentsReturned * 10) {
insights.push({
type: 'excessive_key_examination',
severity: 'medium',
message: 'Query is examining significantly more keys than documents returned',
recommendation: 'Consider compound indexes to improve key examination efficiency',
keysExamined: executionAnalysis.keysExamined,
documentsReturned: executionAnalysis.documentsReturned
});
}
// Check execution time
if (executionAnalysis.executionTime > this.config.slowQueryThresholdMs) {
insights.push({
type: 'slow_execution',
severity: executionAnalysis.executionTime > this.config.slowQueryThresholdMs * 5 ? 'high' : 'medium',
message: `Query execution time (${executionAnalysis.executionTime}ms) exceeds threshold`,
recommendation: 'Consider query optimization or index improvements',
executionTime: executionAnalysis.executionTime,
threshold: this.config.slowQueryThresholdMs
});
}
return insights;
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error generating query optimization insights:', error);
return [];
}
}
async getPerformanceMetrics(timeRangeHours = 24) {
console.log(`Retrieving performance metrics for the last ${timeRangeHours} hours...`);
try {
const startTime = new Date(Date.now() - (timeRangeHours * 60 * 60 * 1000));
// Get comprehensive performance metrics
const metrics = await this.collections.performanceMetrics
.find({
timestamp: { $gte: startTime }
})
.sort({ timestamp: -1 })
.toArray();
// Calculate summary statistics
const performanceSummary = this.calculatePerformanceSummary(metrics);
// Get current optimization recommendations
const currentRecommendations = await this.collections.optimizationRecommendations
.find({
createdAt: { $gte: startTime },
status: { $ne: 'implemented' }
})
.sort({ priority: -1, estimatedImpact: -1 })
.limit(10)
.toArray();
return {
success: true,
timeRangeHours: timeRangeHours,
metricsCollected: metrics.length,
performanceSummary: performanceSummary,
currentRecommendations: currentRecommendations,
lastUpdated: new Date()
};
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error retrieving performance metrics:', error);
return {
success: false,
error: error.message,
timeRangeHours: timeRangeHours
};
}
}
calculatePerformanceSummary(metrics) {
if (metrics.length === 0) {
return {
totalQueries: 0,
averageExecutionTime: 0,
slowQueries: 0,
indexEffectiveness: 'unknown'
};
}
// Extract metrics from analysis results
const analysisResults = metrics
.filter(metric => metric.metricType === 'comprehensive_analysis')
.map(metric => metric.analysisResults);
if (analysisResults.length === 0) {
return {
totalQueries: 0,
averageExecutionTime: 0,
slowQueries: 0,
indexEffectiveness: 'no_data'
};
}
const latestAnalysis = analysisResults[0];
return {
totalQueries: latestAnalysis.queryPerformanceSummary?.totalQueries || 0,
averageExecutionTime: latestAnalysis.queryPerformanceSummary?.averageExecutionTime || 0,
p95ExecutionTime: latestAnalysis.queryPerformanceSummary?.p95ExecutionTime || 0,
slowQueries: latestAnalysis.queryPerformanceSummary?.slowQueries || 0,
// Index effectiveness
indexEffectiveness: {
totalIndexes: latestAnalysis.indexEffectiveness?.totalIndexes || 0,
activelyUsedIndexes: latestAnalysis.indexEffectiveness?.activelyUsedIndexes || 0,
unusedIndexes: latestAnalysis.indexEffectiveness?.unusedIndexes?.length || 0,
averageSelectivity: latestAnalysis.indexEffectiveness?.averageIndexSelectivity || 0
},
// Performance trends
performanceBottlenecks: latestAnalysis.performanceBottlenecks || [],
optimizationOpportunities: latestAnalysis.optimizationOpportunities?.length || 0
};
}
// Utility methods for performance analysis
determineIndexType(index) {
if (index.name === '_id_') return 'primary';
if (index.unique) return 'unique';
if (index.sparse) return 'sparse';
if (index.partialFilterExpression) return 'partial';
if (Object.values(index.key).includes('text')) return 'text';
if (Object.values(index.key).includes('2dsphere')) return 'geospatial';
if (Object.keys(index.key).length > 1) return 'compound';
return 'single';
}
calculateIndexEffectiveness(indexStat, index) {
const usageCount = indexStat.accesses?.ops || 0;
const indexSize = index.size || 0;
// Calculate effectiveness based on usage frequency and size efficiency
if (usageCount === 0) return 0;
if (indexSize === 0) return 1;
// Simple effectiveness metric: usage per MB of index size
const sizeInMB = indexSize / (1024 * 1024);
return Math.min(usageCount / Math.max(sizeInMB, 1), 100);
}
assessIndexHealth(indexStat, index) {
const usageCount = indexStat.accesses?.ops || 0;
const effectiveness = this.calculateIndexEffectiveness(indexStat, index);
if (usageCount === 0) return 'unused';
if (effectiveness < 0.1) return 'inefficient';
if (effectiveness > 10) return 'highly_effective';
return 'moderate';
}
identifyPlanType(winningPlan) {
if (!winningPlan) return 'unknown';
if (winningPlan.stage === 'COLLSCAN') return 'COLLSCAN';
if (winningPlan.stage === 'IXSCAN') return 'IXSCAN';
if (winningPlan.inputStage?.stage === 'IXSCAN') return 'IXSCAN';
return winningPlan.stage || 'unknown';
}
extractIndexesUsed(winningPlan) {
const indexes = [];
function extractFromStage(stage) {
if (stage.indexName) {
indexes.push(stage.indexName);
}
if (stage.inputStage) {
extractFromStage(stage.inputStage);
}
if (stage.inputStages) {
stage.inputStages.forEach(extractFromStage);
}
}
if (winningPlan) {
extractFromStage(winningPlan);
}
return [...new Set(indexes)]; // Remove duplicates
}
hasSortStage(winningPlan) {
if (!winningPlan) return false;
function checkForSort(stage) {
if (stage.stage === 'SORT') return true;
if (stage.inputStage) return checkForSort(stage.inputStage);
if (stage.inputStages) return stage.inputStages.some(checkForSort);
return false;
}
return checkForSort(winningPlan);
}
hasBlockingSortStage(winningPlan) {
if (!winningPlan) return false;
function checkForBlockingSort(stage) {
// A sort is blocking if it's not supported by an index
if (stage.stage === 'SORT' && !stage.inputStage?.stage?.includes('IXSCAN')) {
return true;
}
if (stage.inputStage) return checkForBlockingSort(stage.inputStage);
if (stage.inputStages) return stage.inputStages.some(checkForBlockingSort);
return false;
}
return checkForBlockingSort(winningPlan);
}
assessQueryPerformance(executionStats, winningPlan) {
const executionTime = executionStats.executionTimeMillis || 0;
const selectivityRatio = executionStats.totalDocsExamined > 0
? executionStats.totalDocsReturned / executionStats.totalDocsExamined
: 0;
// Performance rating based on multiple factors
let score = 100;
// Penalize slow execution
if (executionTime > 1000) score -= 40;
else if (executionTime > 500) score -= 20;
else if (executionTime > 100) score -= 10;
// Penalize low selectivity
if (selectivityRatio < 0.01) score -= 30;
else if (selectivityRatio < 0.1) score -= 15;
// Penalize full collection scans
if (winningPlan?.stage === 'COLLSCAN') score -= 25;
// Penalize blocking sorts
if (this.hasBlockingSortStage(winningPlan)) score -= 15;
if (score >= 80) return 'excellent';
if (score >= 60) return 'good';
if (score >= 40) return 'fair';
return 'poor';
}
needsOptimization(executionStats, winningPlan) {
const executionTime = executionStats.executionTimeMillis || 0;
const selectivityRatio = executionStats.totalDocsExamined > 0
? executionStats.totalDocsReturned / executionStats.totalDocsExamined
: 0;
return executionTime > this.config.slowQueryThresholdMs ||
selectivityRatio < 0.1 ||
winningPlan?.stage === 'COLLSCAN' ||
this.hasBlockingSortStage(winningPlan);
}
estimatePerformanceImprovement(slowQuery) {
return {
executionTimeReduction: '60-80%',
documentExaminationReduction: '90-95%',
resourceUsageReduction: '70-85%',
confidenceLevel: 'high'
};
}
estimateIndexSize(indexKeys, collection) {
// Simplified index size estimation
const keyCount = Object.keys(indexKeys).length;
const estimatedDocumentSize = 100; // Average document size estimate
const estimatedCollectionSize = 100000; // Estimate
return keyCount * estimatedDocumentSize * estimatedCollectionSize * 0.1;
}
async shutdown() {
console.log('Shutting down performance optimizer...');
try {
// Disable profiling
if (this.config.enableQueryProfiling) {
await this.db.admin().command({ profile: 0 });
}
// Close MongoDB connection
if (this.client) {
await this.client.close();
}
console.log('Performance optimizer shutdown complete');
} catch (error) {
console.error('Error during shutdown:', error);
}
}
// Additional methods would include implementations for:
// - startRealTimeMonitoring()
// - initializeIndexAnalysis()
// - identifyPerformanceBottlenecks()
// - analyzeIndexUsagePatterns()
// - calculateAverageIndexSelectivity()
// - analyzeCompoundIndexOpportunities()
// - identifyIndexOptimizations()
// - suggestIndexForQuery()
// - suggestSortIndex()
}
// Benefits of MongoDB Advanced Performance Optimization:
// - Comprehensive query performance analysis and monitoring
// - Intelligent index optimization recommendations
// - Real-time performance bottleneck identification
// - Advanced execution plan analysis and insights
// - Automated slow query detection and optimization
// - Index usage effectiveness assessment
// - Compound index optimization strategies
// - SQL-compatible performance operations through QueryLeaf integration
// - Production-ready monitoring and alerting capabilities
// - Enterprise-grade performance tuning automation
module.exports = {
AdvancedPerformanceOptimizer
};
Understanding MongoDB Performance Architecture
Advanced Query Optimization and Index Management Patterns
Implement sophisticated performance optimization workflows for enterprise MongoDB deployments:
// Enterprise-grade performance optimization with advanced analytics capabilities
class EnterprisePerformanceManager extends AdvancedPerformanceOptimizer {
constructor(mongoUri, enterpriseConfig) {
super(mongoUri, enterpriseConfig);
this.enterpriseConfig = {
...enterpriseConfig,
enablePredictiveOptimization: true,
enableCapacityPlanning: true,
enableAutomatedTuning: true,
enablePerformanceForecasting: true,
enableComplianceReporting: true
};
this.setupEnterpriseCapabilities();
this.initializePredictiveAnalytics();
this.setupAutomatedOptimization();
}
async implementAdvancedOptimizationStrategy() {
console.log('Implementing enterprise optimization strategy...');
const optimizationStrategy = {
// Multi-tier optimization approach
optimizationTiers: {
realTimeOptimization: {
enabled: true,
responseTimeThreshold: 100,
automaticIndexCreation: true,
queryRewriting: true
},
batchOptimization: {
enabled: true,
analysisInterval: '1h',
comprehensiveIndexAnalysis: true,
workloadPatternAnalysis: true
},
predictiveOptimization: {
enabled: true,
forecastingHorizon: '7d',
capacityPlanning: true,
performanceTrendAnalysis: true
}
},
// Advanced analytics
performanceAnalytics: {
enableMachineLearning: true,
anomalyDetection: true,
performanceForecasting: true,
workloadCharacterization: true
}
};
return await this.deployOptimizationStrategy(optimizationStrategy);
}
}
SQL-Style Performance Optimization with QueryLeaf
QueryLeaf provides familiar SQL syntax for MongoDB performance analysis and optimization:
-- QueryLeaf advanced performance optimization with SQL-familiar syntax for MongoDB
-- Comprehensive query performance analysis
WITH query_performance_analysis AS (
SELECT
collection_name,
query_shape_hash,
query_pattern_type,
-- Execution statistics
COUNT(*) as execution_count,
AVG(execution_time_ms) as avg_execution_time_ms,
PERCENTILE_CONT(0.95) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY execution_time_ms) as p95_execution_time_ms,
MAX(execution_time_ms) as max_execution_time_ms,
-- Document examination analysis
AVG(documents_examined) as avg_docs_examined,
AVG(documents_returned) as avg_docs_returned,
CASE
WHEN AVG(documents_examined) > 0 THEN
AVG(documents_returned) / AVG(documents_examined)
ELSE 0
END as avg_selectivity_ratio,
-- Index usage analysis
STRING_AGG(DISTINCT index_name, ', ') as indexes_used,
AVG(keys_examined) as avg_keys_examined,
-- Resource utilization
SUM(execution_time_ms) as total_execution_time_ms,
AVG(working_set_size_kb) as avg_working_set_kb,
-- Performance categorization
CASE
WHEN AVG(execution_time_ms) < 50 THEN 'fast'
WHEN AVG(execution_time_ms) < 200 THEN 'moderate'
WHEN AVG(execution_time_ms) < 1000 THEN 'slow'
ELSE 'very_slow'
END as performance_category,
-- Optimization need assessment
CASE
WHEN AVG(execution_time_ms) > 500 OR
(AVG(documents_examined) > AVG(documents_returned) * 100) OR
COUNT(*) > 1000 THEN true
ELSE false
END as needs_optimization
FROM QUERY_PERFORMANCE_LOG
WHERE execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '24 hours'
GROUP BY collection_name, query_shape_hash, query_pattern_type
),
index_effectiveness_analysis AS (
SELECT
collection_name,
index_name,
index_type,
COALESCE(JSON_EXTRACT(index_definition, '$'), '{}') as index_keys,
-- Usage statistics
COALESCE(usage_count, 0) as usage_count,
COALESCE(last_used_timestamp, '1970-01-01'::timestamp) as last_used,
-- Size and storage analysis
index_size_bytes,
ROUND(index_size_bytes / 1024.0 / 1024.0, 2) as index_size_mb,
-- Effectiveness calculations
CASE
WHEN usage_count = 0 THEN 0
WHEN index_size_bytes > 0 THEN
usage_count / GREATEST((index_size_bytes / 1024.0 / 1024.0), 1)
ELSE usage_count
END as effectiveness_score,
-- Usage categorization
CASE
WHEN usage_count = 0 THEN 'unused'
WHEN usage_count < 100 THEN 'rarely_used'
WHEN usage_count < 1000 THEN 'moderately_used'
ELSE 'frequently_used'
END as usage_category,
-- Health assessment
CASE
WHEN usage_count = 0 AND index_name != '_id_' THEN 'candidate_for_removal'
WHEN usage_count > 0 AND index_size_bytes > 100*1024*1024 AND usage_count < 100 THEN 'review_necessity'
WHEN usage_count > 1000 THEN 'valuable'
ELSE 'monitor'
END as health_status,
-- Age analysis
EXTRACT(DAYS FROM (CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - COALESCE(last_used_timestamp, created_timestamp))) as days_since_last_use
FROM INDEX_USAGE_STATS
WHERE analysis_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '7 days'
),
optimization_opportunities AS (
SELECT
qpa.collection_name,
qpa.query_pattern_type,
qpa.execution_count,
qpa.avg_execution_time_ms,
qpa.avg_selectivity_ratio,
qpa.performance_category,
qpa.needs_optimization,
-- Performance impact calculation
qpa.total_execution_time_ms as performance_impact_ms,
ROUND(qpa.total_execution_time_ms / 1000.0, 2) as performance_impact_seconds,
-- Index analysis correlation
COUNT(iea.index_name) as available_indexes,
STRING_AGG(iea.index_name, ', ') as collection_indexes,
AVG(iea.effectiveness_score) as avg_index_effectiveness,
-- Optimization recommendations
CASE
WHEN qpa.avg_selectivity_ratio < 0.01 AND qpa.execution_count > 100 THEN 'create_selective_index'
WHEN qpa.avg_execution_time_ms > 1000 AND qpa.indexes_used IS NULL THEN 'add_supporting_index'
WHEN qpa.avg_execution_time_ms > 500 AND qpa.indexes_used LIKE '%COLLSCAN%' THEN 'replace_collection_scan'
WHEN qpa.performance_category = 'very_slow' THEN 'comprehensive_optimization'
WHEN qpa.execution_count > 10000 AND qpa.performance_category IN ('slow', 'moderate') THEN 'high_frequency_optimization'
ELSE 'monitor_performance'
END as optimization_recommendation,
-- Priority assessment
CASE
WHEN qpa.total_execution_time_ms > 60000 AND qpa.execution_count > 1000 THEN 'critical'
WHEN qpa.total_execution_time_ms > 30000 OR qpa.avg_execution_time_ms > 2000 THEN 'high'
WHEN qpa.total_execution_time_ms > 10000 OR qpa.execution_count > 5000 THEN 'medium'
ELSE 'low'
END as optimization_priority,
-- Estimated improvement potential
CASE
WHEN qpa.avg_selectivity_ratio < 0.01 THEN '80-90% improvement expected'
WHEN qpa.performance_category = 'very_slow' THEN '60-80% improvement expected'
WHEN qpa.performance_category = 'slow' THEN '40-60% improvement expected'
ELSE '20-40% improvement expected'
END as estimated_improvement
FROM query_performance_analysis qpa
LEFT JOIN index_effectiveness_analysis iea ON qpa.collection_name = iea.collection_name
WHERE qpa.needs_optimization = true
GROUP BY
qpa.collection_name, qpa.query_pattern_type, qpa.execution_count,
qpa.avg_execution_time_ms, qpa.avg_selectivity_ratio, qpa.performance_category,
qpa.needs_optimization, qpa.total_execution_time_ms, qpa.indexes_used
)
SELECT
oo.collection_name,
oo.query_pattern_type,
oo.optimization_priority,
oo.optimization_recommendation,
-- Performance metrics
oo.execution_count,
ROUND(oo.avg_execution_time_ms, 2) as avg_execution_time_ms,
ROUND(oo.performance_impact_seconds, 2) as total_impact_seconds,
ROUND(oo.avg_selectivity_ratio * 100, 2) as selectivity_percent,
-- Current state analysis
oo.performance_category,
oo.available_indexes,
COALESCE(oo.collection_indexes, 'No indexes found') as current_indexes,
ROUND(COALESCE(oo.avg_index_effectiveness, 0), 2) as avg_index_effectiveness,
-- Optimization guidance
oo.estimated_improvement,
-- Specific recommendations based on analysis
CASE oo.optimization_recommendation
WHEN 'create_selective_index' THEN
'Create compound index on high-selectivity filter fields for collection: ' || oo.collection_name
WHEN 'add_supporting_index' THEN
'Add index to eliminate collection scans in collection: ' || oo.collection_name
WHEN 'replace_collection_scan' THEN
'Critical: Replace collection scan with indexed access in collection: ' || oo.collection_name
WHEN 'comprehensive_optimization' THEN
'Comprehensive query and index optimization needed for collection: ' || oo.collection_name
WHEN 'high_frequency_optimization' THEN
'Optimize high-frequency queries in collection: ' || oo.collection_name
ELSE 'Continue monitoring performance trends'
END as detailed_recommendation,
-- Implementation complexity assessment
CASE
WHEN oo.available_indexes = 0 THEN 'high_complexity'
WHEN oo.avg_index_effectiveness < 1 THEN 'medium_complexity'
ELSE 'low_complexity'
END as implementation_complexity,
-- Business impact estimation
CASE oo.optimization_priority
WHEN 'critical' THEN 'High business impact - immediate attention required'
WHEN 'high' THEN 'Moderate business impact - optimize within 1 week'
WHEN 'medium' THEN 'Low business impact - optimize within 1 month'
ELSE 'Minimal business impact - optimize when convenient'
END as business_impact_assessment,
-- Resource requirements
CASE
WHEN oo.optimization_recommendation IN ('create_selective_index', 'add_supporting_index') THEN 'Index creation: 5-30 minutes'
WHEN oo.optimization_recommendation = 'comprehensive_optimization' THEN 'Full analysis: 2-8 hours'
ELSE 'Monitoring: ongoing'
END as estimated_effort
FROM optimization_opportunities oo
ORDER BY
CASE oo.optimization_priority
WHEN 'critical' THEN 1
WHEN 'high' THEN 2
WHEN 'medium' THEN 3
ELSE 4
END,
oo.performance_impact_seconds DESC,
oo.execution_count DESC;
-- Index usage and effectiveness analysis
WITH index_usage_trends AS (
SELECT
collection_name,
index_name,
-- Usage trend analysis over time windows
SUM(CASE WHEN analysis_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '1 hour' THEN usage_count ELSE 0 END) as usage_last_hour,
SUM(CASE WHEN analysis_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '24 hours' THEN usage_count ELSE 0 END) as usage_last_24h,
SUM(CASE WHEN analysis_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '7 days' THEN usage_count ELSE 0 END) as usage_last_7d,
-- Size and storage trends
AVG(index_size_bytes) as avg_index_size_bytes,
MAX(index_size_bytes) as max_index_size_bytes,
-- Usage efficiency trends
AVG(CASE WHEN index_size_bytes > 0 AND usage_count > 0 THEN
usage_count / (index_size_bytes / 1024.0 / 1024.0)
ELSE 0
END) as avg_usage_efficiency,
-- Consistency analysis
COUNT(DISTINCT DATE_TRUNC('day', analysis_timestamp)) as analysis_days,
STDDEV(usage_count) as usage_variability,
-- Most recent statistics
MAX(analysis_timestamp) as last_analysis,
MAX(last_used_timestamp) as most_recent_use
FROM index_usage_stats
WHERE analysis_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '7 days'
GROUP BY collection_name, index_name
),
index_recommendations AS (
SELECT
iut.*,
-- Usage trend classification
CASE
WHEN iut.usage_last_hour = 0 AND iut.usage_last_24h = 0 AND iut.usage_last_7d = 0 THEN 'completely_unused'
WHEN iut.usage_last_hour = 0 AND iut.usage_last_24h = 0 AND iut.usage_last_7d > 0 THEN 'infrequently_used'
WHEN iut.usage_last_hour = 0 AND iut.usage_last_24h > 0 THEN 'daily_usage'
WHEN iut.usage_last_hour > 0 THEN 'active_usage'
ELSE 'unknown_usage'
END as usage_trend,
-- Storage efficiency assessment
CASE
WHEN iut.avg_index_size_bytes > 1024*1024*1024 AND iut.usage_last_7d < 100 THEN 'storage_inefficient'
WHEN iut.avg_index_size_bytes > 100*1024*1024 AND iut.usage_last_7d < 10 THEN 'questionable_storage_usage'
WHEN iut.avg_usage_efficiency > 10 THEN 'storage_efficient'
ELSE 'acceptable_storage_usage'
END as storage_efficiency,
-- Recommendation generation
CASE
WHEN iut.usage_last_7d = 0 AND iut.index_name != '_id_' THEN 'consider_dropping'
WHEN iut.avg_index_size_bytes > 500*1024*1024 AND iut.usage_last_7d < 50 THEN 'evaluate_necessity'
WHEN iut.usage_variability > iut.usage_last_7d * 0.8 THEN 'inconsistent_usage_investigate'
WHEN iut.avg_usage_efficiency > 20 THEN 'high_value_maintain'
WHEN iut.usage_last_hour > 100 THEN 'critical_index_monitor'
ELSE 'continue_monitoring'
END as recommendation,
-- Impact assessment for potential changes
CASE
WHEN iut.usage_last_hour > 0 THEN 'high_impact_if_removed'
WHEN iut.usage_last_24h > 0 THEN 'medium_impact_if_removed'
WHEN iut.usage_last_7d > 0 THEN 'low_impact_if_removed'
ELSE 'no_impact_if_removed'
END as removal_impact,
-- Storage savings potential
CASE
WHEN iut.avg_index_size_bytes > 0 THEN
ROUND(iut.avg_index_size_bytes / 1024.0 / 1024.0, 2)
ELSE 0
END as storage_savings_mb
FROM index_usage_trends iut
),
collection_performance_summary AS (
SELECT
collection_name,
COUNT(*) as total_indexes,
-- Usage distribution
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE usage_trend = 'active_usage') as active_indexes,
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE usage_trend = 'daily_usage') as daily_indexes,
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE usage_trend = 'infrequently_used') as infrequent_indexes,
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE usage_trend = 'completely_unused') as unused_indexes,
-- Storage analysis
SUM(avg_index_size_bytes) as total_index_storage_bytes,
AVG(avg_usage_efficiency) as collection_avg_efficiency,
-- Optimization potential
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE recommendation = 'consider_dropping') as indexes_to_drop,
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE recommendation = 'evaluate_necessity') as indexes_to_evaluate,
SUM(CASE WHEN recommendation IN ('consider_dropping', 'evaluate_necessity')
THEN storage_savings_mb ELSE 0 END) as potential_storage_savings_mb,
-- Collection health assessment
CASE
WHEN COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE usage_trend = 'active_usage') = 0 THEN 'no_active_indexes'
WHEN COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE usage_trend = 'completely_unused') > COUNT(*) * 0.5 THEN 'many_unused_indexes'
WHEN AVG(avg_usage_efficiency) < 1 THEN 'poor_index_efficiency'
ELSE 'healthy_index_usage'
END as collection_health
FROM index_recommendations
GROUP BY collection_name
)
SELECT
cps.collection_name,
cps.total_indexes,
cps.collection_health,
-- Index usage distribution
cps.active_indexes,
cps.daily_indexes,
cps.infrequent_indexes,
cps.unused_indexes,
-- Storage utilization
ROUND(cps.total_index_storage_bytes / 1024.0 / 1024.0, 2) as total_storage_mb,
ROUND(cps.collection_avg_efficiency, 2) as avg_efficiency_score,
-- Optimization opportunities
cps.indexes_to_drop,
cps.indexes_to_evaluate,
ROUND(cps.potential_storage_savings_mb, 2) as potential_savings_mb,
-- Optimization priority
CASE
WHEN cps.collection_health = 'no_active_indexes' THEN 'critical_review_needed'
WHEN cps.unused_indexes > 5 OR cps.potential_storage_savings_mb > 1000 THEN 'high_cleanup_priority'
WHEN cps.collection_avg_efficiency < 2 THEN 'medium_optimization_priority'
ELSE 'low_maintenance_priority'
END as optimization_priority,
-- Recommendations summary
CASE cps.collection_health
WHEN 'no_active_indexes' THEN 'URGENT: Collection has no actively used indexes - investigate query patterns'
WHEN 'many_unused_indexes' THEN 'Multiple unused indexes detected - perform index cleanup'
WHEN 'poor_index_efficiency' THEN 'Index usage is inefficient - review index design'
ELSE 'Index usage appears healthy - continue monitoring'
END as primary_recommendation,
-- Storage efficiency assessment
CASE
WHEN cps.potential_storage_savings_mb > 1000 THEN
'High storage optimization potential: ' || ROUND(cps.potential_storage_savings_mb, 0) || 'MB recoverable'
WHEN cps.potential_storage_savings_mb > 100 THEN
'Moderate storage optimization: ' || ROUND(cps.potential_storage_savings_mb, 0) || 'MB recoverable'
WHEN cps.potential_storage_savings_mb > 10 THEN
'Minor storage optimization: ' || ROUND(cps.potential_storage_savings_mb, 0) || 'MB recoverable'
ELSE 'Minimal storage optimization potential'
END as storage_optimization_summary,
-- Specific next actions
ARRAY[
CASE WHEN cps.indexes_to_drop > 0 THEN
'Review and drop ' || cps.indexes_to_drop || ' unused indexes' END,
CASE WHEN cps.indexes_to_evaluate > 0 THEN
'Evaluate necessity of ' || cps.indexes_to_evaluate || ' underutilized indexes' END,
CASE WHEN cps.collection_avg_efficiency < 1 THEN
'Redesign indexes for better efficiency' END,
CASE WHEN cps.active_indexes = 0 THEN
'Investigate why no indexes are actively used' END
]::TEXT[] as action_items
FROM collection_performance_summary cps
ORDER BY
CASE cps.collection_health
WHEN 'no_active_indexes' THEN 1
WHEN 'many_unused_indexes' THEN 2
WHEN 'poor_index_efficiency' THEN 3
ELSE 4
END,
cps.potential_storage_savings_mb DESC,
cps.total_indexes DESC;
-- Real-time query performance monitoring and alerting
CREATE VIEW real_time_performance_dashboard AS
WITH current_performance AS (
SELECT
collection_name,
query_pattern_type,
-- Recent performance metrics (last hour)
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '1 hour') as queries_last_hour,
AVG(execution_time_ms) FILTER (WHERE execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '1 hour') as avg_time_last_hour,
MAX(execution_time_ms) FILTER (WHERE execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '1 hour') as max_time_last_hour,
-- Performance trend comparison (current hour vs previous hour)
AVG(execution_time_ms) FILTER (WHERE execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '2 hours'
AND execution_timestamp < CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '1 hour') as avg_time_prev_hour,
-- Critical performance indicators
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '1 hour'
AND execution_time_ms > 5000) as critical_slow_queries,
COUNT(*) FILTER (WHERE execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '1 hour'
AND execution_time_ms > 1000) as slow_queries,
-- Resource utilization trends
AVG(documents_examined) FILTER (WHERE execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '1 hour') as avg_docs_examined,
AVG(documents_returned) FILTER (WHERE execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '1 hour') as avg_docs_returned,
-- Most recent query information
MAX(execution_timestamp) as last_execution,
MAX(execution_time_ms) as recent_max_time
FROM query_performance_log
WHERE execution_timestamp >= CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - INTERVAL '2 hours'
GROUP BY collection_name, query_pattern_type
),
performance_alerts AS (
SELECT
cp.*,
-- Performance trend analysis
CASE
WHEN cp.avg_time_last_hour > cp.avg_time_prev_hour * 2 THEN 'degradation_alert'
WHEN cp.avg_time_last_hour > 2000 THEN 'slow_performance_alert'
WHEN cp.critical_slow_queries > 0 THEN 'critical_performance_alert'
WHEN cp.queries_last_hour > 1000 AND cp.avg_time_last_hour > 500 THEN 'high_volume_slow_alert'
ELSE 'normal'
END as alert_level,
-- Selectivity analysis
CASE
WHEN cp.avg_docs_examined > 0 THEN cp.avg_docs_returned / cp.avg_docs_examined
ELSE 1
END as current_selectivity,
-- Performance change calculation
CASE
WHEN cp.avg_time_prev_hour > 0 THEN
ROUND(((cp.avg_time_last_hour - cp.avg_time_prev_hour) / cp.avg_time_prev_hour) * 100, 1)
ELSE 0
END as performance_change_percent,
-- Alert priority
CASE
WHEN cp.critical_slow_queries > 0 THEN 'critical'
WHEN cp.avg_time_last_hour > cp.avg_time_prev_hour * 2 THEN 'high'
WHEN cp.slow_queries > 10 THEN 'medium'
ELSE 'low'
END as alert_priority
FROM current_performance cp
WHERE cp.queries_last_hour > 0
)
SELECT
pa.collection_name,
pa.query_pattern_type,
pa.alert_level,
pa.alert_priority,
-- Current performance metrics
pa.queries_last_hour,
ROUND(pa.avg_time_last_hour, 2) as current_avg_time_ms,
pa.max_time_last_hour,
pa.recent_max_time,
-- Performance comparison
ROUND(COALESCE(pa.avg_time_prev_hour, 0), 2) as previous_avg_time_ms,
pa.performance_change_percent || '%' as performance_change,
-- Problem severity indicators
pa.critical_slow_queries,
pa.slow_queries,
ROUND(pa.current_selectivity * 100, 2) as selectivity_percent,
-- Alert messages
CASE pa.alert_level
WHEN 'critical_performance_alert' THEN
'CRITICAL: ' || pa.critical_slow_queries || ' queries exceeded 5 second threshold'
WHEN 'degradation_alert' THEN
'WARNING: Performance degraded by ' || pa.performance_change_percent || '% from previous hour'
WHEN 'slow_performance_alert' THEN
'WARNING: Average query time (' || ROUND(pa.avg_time_last_hour, 0) || 'ms) exceeds acceptable threshold'
WHEN 'high_volume_slow_alert' THEN
'WARNING: High query volume (' || pa.queries_last_hour || ') with slow performance'
ELSE 'No performance alerts'
END as alert_message,
-- Recommended actions
CASE pa.alert_level
WHEN 'critical_performance_alert' THEN 'Immediate investigation required - check for index issues or resource constraints'
WHEN 'degradation_alert' THEN 'Investigate performance regression - check recent changes or resource utilization'
WHEN 'slow_performance_alert' THEN 'Review query optimization opportunities and index effectiveness'
WHEN 'high_volume_slow_alert' THEN 'Consider query optimization and capacity scaling'
ELSE 'Continue monitoring'
END as recommended_action,
-- Urgency indicator
CASE pa.alert_priority
WHEN 'critical' THEN 'Immediate attention required (< 15 minutes)'
WHEN 'high' THEN 'Urgent attention needed (< 1 hour)'
WHEN 'medium' THEN 'Should be addressed within 4 hours'
ELSE 'Monitor and address during normal maintenance'
END as response_urgency,
-- Last occurrence
pa.last_execution,
EXTRACT(MINUTES FROM (CURRENT_TIMESTAMP - pa.last_execution)) as minutes_since_last_query
FROM performance_alerts pa
WHERE pa.alert_level != 'normal'
ORDER BY
CASE pa.alert_priority
WHEN 'critical' THEN 1
WHEN 'high' THEN 2
WHEN 'medium' THEN 3
ELSE 4
END,
pa.performance_change_percent DESC,
pa.avg_time_last_hour DESC;
-- QueryLeaf provides comprehensive MongoDB performance optimization capabilities:
-- 1. Advanced query performance analysis with SQL-familiar syntax
-- 2. Comprehensive index usage monitoring and effectiveness analysis
-- 3. Real-time performance alerting and automated optimization recommendations
-- 4. Detailed execution plan analysis and optimization insights
-- 5. Index optimization strategies including compound index recommendations
-- 6. Performance trend analysis and predictive optimization
-- 7. Resource utilization monitoring and capacity planning
-- 8. Automated slow query detection and optimization guidance
-- 9. Enterprise-grade performance management with minimal configuration
-- 10. Production-ready monitoring and optimization automation
Best Practices for Production Performance Optimization
Index Strategy Design Principles
Essential principles for effective MongoDB index optimization deployment:
- Compound Index Design: Create efficient compound indexes following ESR rule (Equality, Sort, Range) for optimal query performance
- Index Usage Monitoring: Continuously monitor index usage patterns and effectiveness to identify optimization opportunities
- Query Pattern Analysis: Analyze query execution patterns to understand workload characteristics and optimization requirements
- Performance Testing: Implement comprehensive performance testing procedures for index changes and query optimizations
- Capacity Planning: Monitor query performance trends and resource utilization for proactive capacity management
- Automated Optimization: Establish automated performance monitoring and optimization recommendation systems
Enterprise Performance Management
Design performance optimization systems for enterprise-scale requirements:
- Real-Time Monitoring: Implement comprehensive real-time performance monitoring with intelligent alerting and automated responses
- Predictive Analytics: Use performance trend analysis and predictive modeling for proactive optimization and capacity planning
- Performance Governance: Establish performance standards, monitoring procedures, and optimization workflows
- Resource Optimization: Balance query performance with storage efficiency and maintenance overhead
- Compliance Integration: Ensure performance optimization procedures meet operational and compliance requirements
- Knowledge Management: Document optimization procedures, performance patterns, and best practices for operational excellence
Conclusion
MongoDB index optimization and query performance analysis provides comprehensive database tuning capabilities that enable applications to achieve optimal performance through intelligent indexing strategies, sophisticated query analysis, and automated optimization recommendations. The native performance analysis tools and integrated optimization guidance ensure that database operations maintain peak efficiency with minimal operational overhead.
Key MongoDB Performance Optimization benefits include:
- Intelligent Analysis: Advanced query performance analysis with automated bottleneck identification and optimization recommendations
- Index Optimization: Comprehensive index usage analysis with effectiveness assessment and automated cleanup suggestions
- Real-Time Monitoring: Continuous performance monitoring with intelligent alerting and proactive optimization capabilities
- Execution Plan Analysis: Detailed query execution plan analysis with optimization insights and improvement recommendations
- Automated Recommendations: AI-powered optimization recommendations based on workload patterns and performance characteristics
- SQL Accessibility: Familiar SQL-style performance operations through QueryLeaf for accessible database optimization
Whether you're optimizing high-traffic applications, managing large-scale data workloads, implementing performance monitoring systems, or maintaining enterprise database performance, MongoDB performance optimization with QueryLeaf's familiar SQL interface provides the foundation for sophisticated, scalable database tuning operations.
QueryLeaf Integration: QueryLeaf automatically translates SQL-style performance analysis operations into MongoDB's native profiling and indexing capabilities, making advanced performance optimization accessible to SQL-oriented database administrators. Complex index analysis, query optimization recommendations, and performance monitoring are seamlessly handled through familiar SQL constructs, enabling sophisticated database tuning without requiring deep MongoDB performance expertise.
The combination of MongoDB's robust performance analysis capabilities with SQL-style optimization operations makes it an ideal platform for applications requiring both sophisticated database performance management and familiar database administration patterns, ensuring your database operations can maintain optimal performance while scaling efficiently as workload complexity and data volume grow.